TOEFL iBT Writing Conqueror — Practice Prompts and Step-by-Step FeedbackThe Writing section of the TOEFL iBT can feel like a steep climb: two tasks, strict timing, and an examiner looking for organization, development, grammar, and vocabulary. This guide — “TOEFL iBT Writing Conqueror — Practice Prompts and Step-by-Step Feedback” — gives a structured plan, realistic prompts, sample responses, and detailed feedback so you can practice with purpose and improve quickly.
Overview of the TOEFL iBT Writing Section
The TOEFL iBT Writing part contains two tasks:
- Integrated Writing (20 minutes): read a short passage, listen to a related lecture, and write a 150–225 word response summarizing and explaining how the lecture relates to the reading.
- Independent Writing (30 minutes): write a clear, well-developed essay (about 300–350+ words) on a given prompt expressing and supporting your opinion.
Focus areas graders assess: task fulfillment, organization, coherence, development of ideas, grammar accuracy, range of vocabulary, and proper use of source material in the Integrated task.
How to Use This Guide
- Begin by timing yourself exactly as on test day: 20 minutes for Integrated, 30 minutes for Independent.
- Use the practice prompts below. After writing, compare your essay to the sample answers and the feedback notes.
- Revise your essay once using the step-by-step feedback; re-time and rewrite similar prompts weekly.
- Track errors and improvements: grammar, structure, lexical range, and task response.
Practice Prompts
Below are 8 Integrated prompts and 12 Independent prompts. Mix and match when practicing. For each Integrated prompt, a short reading summary and lecture summary are provided to simulate the materials; when practicing, rely on both content pieces when composing your response.
Integrated Prompts (20 minutes each)
Integrated Prompt 1
Reading summary: University introduces a plan to replace printed textbooks with tablets to reduce costs and update content faster.
Lecture summary: The professor argues tablets are costly, distract students, and have technical issues that hinder learning.
Integrated Prompt 2
Reading summary: A city suggests expanding late-night public transport to reduce drunk-driving incidents.
Lecture summary: A researcher contends that most drunk-driving incidents occur earlier in the night and that costs outweigh benefits.
Integrated Prompt 3
Reading summary: A university proposes changing the grading system from letter grades to pass/fail to reduce student stress.
Lecture summary: The speaker claims pass/fail removes motivation for high achievement and harms graduate school applicants.
Integrated Prompt 4
Reading summary: A proposal recommends banning single-use plastic bags in local markets to protect wildlife.
Lecture summary: An environmental scientist explains that bans shift waste to heavier alternatives and hurt low-income shoppers.
Integrated Prompt 5
Reading summary: A company plans to increase telecommuting options to save office space and increase productivity.
Lecture summary: A manager argues that remote work reduces collaboration and weakens company culture.
Integrated Prompt 6
Reading summary: The college plans to increase tuition to fund a new research building.
Lecture summary: A student leader says the building will primarily benefit a few departments and suggests alternative funding.
Integrated Prompt 7
Reading summary: A campus proposal recommends later class start times to improve student sleep.
Lecture summary: The lecturer notes scheduling conflicts with labs and faculty constraints and doubts large-scale benefits.
Integrated Prompt 8
Reading summary: City council suggests converting an unused rail line into a bike trail to promote tourism.
Lecture summary: An economist argues the rail line is valuable for future freight use and conversion could cost more long-term.
Independent Prompts (30 minutes each)
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should require students to take at least one course in financial literacy. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
- Some people prefer to work for a large company; others prefer a small firm. Which do you prefer and why?
- Is it better to travel alone or with companions? Explain your choice with reasons and examples.
- Do you think the government should invest more in public parks than shopping centers? Why or why not?
- Many students use smartphones while studying. Do the benefits outweigh the disadvantages? Explain.
- Should employees be allowed to set their own work hours? Discuss advantages and disadvantages.
- Do you agree that learning history is more important than learning science? Support your view.
- Should art and music classes be required in high school? Explain your position.
- Is it better for cities to prioritize public transportation over roads for cars? Why or why not?
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement: “People learn more from failures than from successes.” Provide reasons.
- Should governments impose higher taxes on unhealthy foods to reduce consumption? Explain.
- Is online education as effective as in-person education? Discuss with examples.
Sample Responses and Step-by-Step Feedback
Below are examples for one Integrated prompt and one Independent prompt, followed by targeted feedback you can apply in revisions.
Example — Integrated (Prompt 1)
Sample response (approx. 180–200 words):
The reading passage claims that replacing printed textbooks with tablets will reduce costs and allow faster content updates. It also suggests tablets are environmentally friendlier by saving paper. However, the lecture disputes several of these points. First, the professor states that the initial cost of purchasing tablets and maintaining them is substantial, which could outweigh savings from not buying textbooks. Second, he argues that tablets can distract students: notifications and apps reduce concentration, so learning may suffer. Finally, the professor notes technical problems—software glitches, battery failures, and compatibility issues—that interrupt classes and require additional technical support, further increasing expenses. In short, while the reading emphasizes the potential benefits of tablets, the lecture raises practical concerns about cost, distraction, and reliability that challenge the proposal’s effectiveness.
Feedback (what this response does well)
- Task fulfillment: Clearly summarizes the reading and explains how the lecture counters it.
- Organization: Logical sequence — main points from reading then corresponding lecture rebuttals.
- Conciseness: Focuses on key conflicts without unnecessary detail.
Feedback (how to improve)
- Add a brief sentence explicitly linking each lecture point to why it undermines the reading’s claim (e.g., “This undermines the cost-saving claim because…”).
- Use one or two varied synonyms to avoid repeating “professor argues” frequently.
- Include one direct comparison phrase (e.g., “whereas” or “in contrast”) to strengthen cohesion.
Typical score-level notes
- This essay corresponds to a high-intermediate to low-advanced Integrated response: adequate organization and task completion, with room to increase cohesion and precision to reach top band.
Example — Independent (Prompt 5: Smartphones while studying)
Sample response (approx. 330 words):
Smartphones have become an indispensable tool for students, offering both valuable resources and notable distractions. I believe the benefits outweigh the disadvantages, provided students use devices responsibly and with proper self-control.
First, smartphones give students immediate access to information and educational apps. Instead of searching through books or going to a library, students can quickly look up facts, use dictionary apps, and access lecture slides. For example, when I study vocabulary, language apps help reinforce learning through repetition and quizzes, which speeds up retention.
Second, communication tools on smartphones allow collaboration. Messaging apps and shared documents let classmates coordinate projects and seek clarifications from instructors outside class time. A study group I joined used a group chat to divide tasks and share research links, which led to a higher-quality presentation.
However, smartphones also introduce distractions such as social media and games that can fragment attention. Notifications and the ease of switching between apps reduce deep-focus study time. To manage this, students should set screen-time limits, enable “do not disturb” modes, and use productivity apps that block distracting sites during study sessions.
In conclusion, smartphones bring powerful study aids and collaborative tools that, when paired with disciplined usage strategies, make them a net positive for students’ learning.
Feedback (what this response does well)
- Clear thesis and well-structured supporting paragraphs.
- Effective use of specific personal example.
- Addresses counterargument and offers practical solutions.
Feedback (how to improve)
- Expand one example with brief data or a cited study for stronger support.
- Vary sentence openings and add one complex sentence to demonstrate syntactic range.
- Add a concluding sentence that restates the thesis in different words.
Typical score-level notes
- This essay fits a high band independent response: clear development, relevant examples, and addressed counterarguments. To push into the top band, include slightly more complex grammar and a broader range of vocabulary.
Step-by-Step Feedback Checklist (for your revisions)
-
Task response
- Integrated: Did you summarize both sources and show their relationship?
- Independent: Is your position clear and supported with reasons/examples?
-
Organization & Cohesion
- Use clear topic sentences.
- Link paragraphs with transitional phrases (however, moreover, in contrast, consequently).
- Keep paragraph length balanced.
-
Development & Content
- Include 2–3 main supporting points with at least one specific example each.
- Avoid irrelevant details.
-
Language Use
- Aim for varied sentence structures: simple, compound, complex.
- Use a range of vocabulary but avoid forced word choice.
-
Grammar & Mechanics
- Check subject-verb agreement, verb tenses, articles, prepositions, and punctuation.
- Limit recurring mistakes—track them in a list and target them each week.
-
Timing & Planning
- Integrated: Spend ~3–4 minutes reading, ~2 minutes taking notes, ~13–15 minutes writing, ~1 minute proofreading.
- Independent: Spend ~5–7 minutes planning, ~20–22 minutes writing, ~2–3 minutes proofreading.
Revision Routine
- Week 1–2: Do three Integrated and two Independent timed essays. Use the checklist to self-edit and revise each piece once.
- Week 3–4: Increase volume to five Integrated and three Independent essays per week. Start comparing your essays to high-scoring samples.
- Week 5+: Focus on repeating prompts where you had trouble; track error patterns and measure progress with a weekly sample scored against official rubrics.
Quick Scoring Rubric (Concise)
- Integrated: High score — clear summary of reading and lecture, accurate connection, organized, minimal language errors.
- Independent: High score — clear position, well-developed reasons/examples, logical organization, wide lexical and grammatical range.
Common Mistakes and How to Fix Them
- Repeating the prompt unnecessarily — begin with a brief paraphrase, not a copy.
- Overly long quoting of the reading/lecture — summarize instead.
- Ignoring time limits — practice strict timing.
- Weak topic sentences — write one-sentence topic sentences for clarity.
- Limited vocabulary range — learn and practice 10 new academic words weekly in context.
Final Tips
- Practice consistently with timed essays and focused revisions.
- Get feedback from a teacher or partner once per week if possible.
- Record recurring grammar mistakes and target those in focused drills.
- Read high-scoring essays to internalize structure and language patterns.
If you want, I can:
- Provide scored feedback on one of your essays (paste it here).
- Generate 5 more prompts and sample high-scoring responses.